One-to-one coaching
The counsel who will not decide for you.
Senior leaders sometimes come on their own rather than with a team or a brief. This is the smallest and least packaged thing he does, and deliberately so — there is no programme, no fixed number of sessions and no curriculum. There is a decision, or a pattern, and someone to think it through with who has spent a career studying how organizations actually behave.
Whether it is a fit is the first thing worth establishing, and it is a short conversation.

What arrives
Three things senior people bring on their own.
None of these is a training need, which is why they rarely arrive as a programme brief. He has described them turning up unannounced — “senior executives and industry experts often ask me…”, “one of the usual predicaments senior professionals share with me…”
A call that cannot be delegated
Every model has been run and the analysis is not the problem. What makes it hard is that the cost of acting falls on people the leader knows by name. The site’s reading of the Bhagavad Gita opens on this exact paralysis, and treats it as the real problem rather than the arithmetic.
A new seat, and nobody to ask
A step up, a move across, a first year in a role where the honest conversations have quietly stopped. He has published on what determines whether a senior person settles and performs, and on the barriers that hold careers back without ever being said out loud.
Something that keeps happening
The same argument, the same stall, the same people going quiet. His research covers what unfair treatment and isolation actually do to senior people — how they turn into knowledge hiding, disengagement and a slow withdrawal of discretionary effort.
Before you ask
Four things this is not.
Easier to rule out early than to discover three conversations in.
- It is not therapy. He holds a Masters in Psychology and it informs how he listens, but this is work about decisions, roles and organizations. If what is needed is clinical support, that is a different professional and he will say so.
- It is not a packaged programme. There is no set number of sessions and no published cadence, because none is fixed. What it takes depends entirely on what you arrive with.
- It is not somebody making the decision for you. The point is a sharper version of your own judgment, not a borrowed one. A leader who wanted the answer handed over would be better served by the advisory work.
- It is not separate from everything else. It draws on the same published research and the same systems view of organizations as the programmes and the consulting.
Behind the conversation
Where the judgment comes from.
Not a coaching qualification — a research career spent on how organizations and the people in them actually behave.
- M.A. Psychology — Indira Gandhi National Open University, specialising in organizational behaviour and human resource management.
- PhD in Management, Strategy and HRM — IIM Ahmedabad.
- Faculty in Strategy and Human Resource Management — XLRI Jamshedpur; previously IIM Kozhikode and SPJIMR.
- SHRM Senior Certified Professional — and ten peer-reviewed papers on careers, fairness, well-being and how leaders decide.
What leaders say
In their own words.
Written by the senior professionals who have worked with him — notes sent after programmes ended, and recommendations left publicly on LinkedIn.
Next step
Say so in the first message.
Tell him it is the one-to-one work you are asking about, and what you are carrying into it. He will tell you whether it is a fit — and if it is not, which of the other three is.